This is early beta for now! Can't handle all templates properly

Hankkija

Vastaanotettu Hilmaan2021-06-18
Ilmoituksen numero2021-076279
TED numero2021/S 119-315809
OstajaorganisaatioUlkoministeriö (0245973-9 )
PL 176
FI-00023 Valtioneuvosto
https://um.fi/
Hankinnan otsikkotiedotFramework Agreement for Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility (PIF) and Concessional Credit Projects
Hankinnan yhteenlaskettu kokonaisarvo koko ajalle (ilman alv:ta) arvio4 800 000 EUR
Hankinnan yhteenlaskettu kokonaisarvo koko ajalle (ilman alv:ta) lopullinen
Alkuperäinen ilmoitushttps://www.hankintailmoitukset.fi/en/public/procurement/54145/notice/76279/overview
Originaali JSON tietue76279.json

Ostettava

Hankinnan lyhyt kuvausThe object is to have a Framework Agreement for Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility (PIF) and Concessional Credit Projects Financed by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA) of Finland. The purpose of the Framework Agreement is to offer consultancy services for the MFA to support the implementation of the PIF and Concessional Credit Projects. See further details Annex 1 Service Description. Customer will select three (3) Service Providers for assignments in the Environmental Sector. Service Providers will be ranked in order 1-3 due using the criteria set in this Invitation to Tender. The Customer will select the Service Provider for individual assignments in the order they are listed (first Company 1, then 2 and the 3). An assignment is always initiated by the Customer, either by e-mail or written letter. If the Service Provider is able to fulfill the Customer's request for service, the Service Provider will deliver the following according to the deadline defined in the Customer's request: - Offered consultants - Time of delivery (to which the service provider commits to) - (If the Customer specifically asks) a work plan - Price / estimation of price (according to the daily prices specified in Price Annex 2) - Expenses (for instance an estimate of travel expenses) Based on the Service Provider's written response, the Customer will make an award decision and a written assignment. All orders are done in writing. The same request will be sent to the 2nd Service Provider in the following circumstances: -if no acceptance of the request of the service is received within deadline; -if Customer has rejected the proposed work plan; -if the Service Provider's acceptance of the request for service is rejected due to the failure to comply with the Framework agreement; or -if the Service Provider declares prior to the deadline as being unable to carry out the assignment. The same request will be sent to the 3rd Service Provider, if any of the circumstances specified above occur with the Services Provider ranked as No 2 as well. Further it should be noted that the same Service Provider cannot provide support towards preparing a project document and appraising that document. As such, the service request will be made to the first eligible Service Provider. For example, if Company 1 has provided support in preparing a project document, the service request for the appraisal will be first sent to Company 2. The same principle applies if multiple Service Providers are using same consultant / expert. See further details Annex 3A Draft Framework Agreement CORRECTED. In case the Customer requires a service: -that has not been specified in relation to any of the sectors of the original competitive tendering procedure (Environmental, Infrastructure, Social Services), but is still inside the scope of Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility; - estimated workload (taking into account the timetable) is too great for six people; or - none of the Service Providers can be accepted to fulfill the request for service, the Customer will send an invitation to tender to all selected Service Providers and will thus organize a “mini-competition” to which only the service providers selected to the Framework Agreement are able to submit tenders. The selection in mini-competition will be based on best price-quality tender. The tenders will be assessed on the basis of one or more of the following criteria: - Price (25-50 %) - Quality of offered personnel (25-50 %) - Quality of project plan (0-50 %) - Quality of working methods (0-50 %) See further details Annex 3A Framework Agreement.
Hankintanimikkeistö (CPV) pää
Hankintanimikkeistö (CPV) muutResearch and development services and related consultancy services (73000000)
AluekoodiFI
Pääasiallinen suorituspaikka

Sopimukset

Ostettava

Hankinnan lyhyt kuvausThe object is to have a Framework Agreement for Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility (PIF) and Concessional Credit Projects Financed by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA) of Finland. The purpose of the Framework Agreement is to offer consultancy services for the MFA to support the implementation of the PIF and Concessional Credit Projects. See further details Annex 1 Service Description. Customer will select three (3) Service Providers for assignments in the Infrastructure Sector. Service Providers will be ranked in order 1-3 due using the criteria set in this Invitation to Tender. The Customer will select the Service Provider for individual assignments in the order they are listed (first Company 1, then 2 and the 3). An assignment is always initiated by the Customer, either by e-mail or written letter. If the Service Provider is able to fulfill the Customer's request for service, the Service Provider will deliver the following according to the deadline defined in the Customer's request: - Offered consultants - Time of delivery (to which the service provider commits to) - (If the Customer specifically asks) a work plan - Price / estimation of price (according to the daily prices specified in Price Annex 2) - Expenses (for instance an estimate of travel expenses) Based on the Service Provider's written response, the Customer will make an award decision and a written assignment. All orders are done in writing. The same request will be sent to the 2nd Service Provider in the following circumstances: -if no acceptance of the request of the service is received within deadline; -if Customer has rejected the proposed work plan; -if the Service Provider's acceptance of the request for service is rejected due to the failure to comply with the Framework agreement; or -if the Service Provider declares prior to the deadline as being unable to carry out the assignment. The same request will be sent to the 3rd Service Provider, if any of the circumstances specified above occur with the Services Provider ranked as No 2 as well. Further it should be noted that the same Service Provider cannot provide support towards preparing a project document and appraising that document. As such, the service request will be made to the first eligible Service Provider. For example, if Company 1 has provided support in preparing a project document, the service request for the appraisal will be first sent to Company 2. The same principle applies if multiple Service Providers are using same consultant / expert. See further details Annex 3A Draft Framework Agreement CORRECTED. In case the Customer requires a service: -that has not been specified in relation to any of the sectors of the original competitive tendering procedure (Environmental, Infrastructure, Social Services), but is still inside the scope of Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility; - estimated workload (taking into account the timetable) is too great for six people; or - none of the Service Providers can be accepted to fulfill the request for service, the Customer will send an invitation to tender to all selected Service Providers and will thus organize a “mini-competition” to which only the service providers selected to the Framework Agreement are able to submit tenders. The selection in mini-competition will be based on best price-quality tender. The tenders will be assessed on the basis of one or more of the following criteria: - Price (25-50 %) - Quality of offered personnel (25-50 %) - Quality of project plan (0-50 %) - Quality of working methods (0-50 %) See further details Annex 3A Framework Agreement.
Hankintanimikkeistö (CPV) pää
Hankintanimikkeistö (CPV) muutResearch and development services and related consultancy services (73000000)
AluekoodiFI
Pääasiallinen suorituspaikka

Sopimukset

Ostettava

Hankinnan lyhyt kuvausThe object is to have a Framework Agreement for Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility (PIF) and Concessional Credit Projects Financed by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs (MFA) of Finland. The purpose of the Framework Agreement is to offer consultancy services for the MFA to support the implementation of the PIF and Concessional Credit Projects. See further details Annex 1 Service Description. Customer will select three (3) Service Providers for assignments in the Social Services Sector. Service Providers will be ranked in order 1-3 due using the criteria set in this Invitation to Tender. The Customer will select the Service Provider for individual assignments in the order they are listed (first Company 1, then 2 and the 3). An assignment is always initiated by the Customer, either by e-mail or written letter. If the Service Provider is able to fulfill the Customer's request for service, the Service Provider will deliver the following according to the deadline defined in the Customer's request: - Offered consultants - Time of delivery (to which the service provider commits to) - (If the Customer specifically asks) a work plan - Price / estimation of price (according to the daily prices specified in Price Annex 2) - Expenses (for instance an estimate of travel expenses) Based on the Service Provider's written response, the Customer will make an award decision and a written assignment. All orders are done in writing. The same request will be sent to the 2nd Service Provider in the following circumstances: -if no acceptance of the request of the service is received within deadline; -if Customer has rejected the proposed work plan; -if the Service Provider's acceptance of the request for service is rejected due to the failure to comply with the Framework agreement; or -if the Service Provider declares prior to the deadline as being unable to carry out the assignment. The same request will be sent to the 3rd Service Provider, if any of the circumstances specified above occur with the Services Provider ranked as No 2 as well. Further it should be noted that the same Service Provider cannot provide support towards preparing a project document and appraising that document. As such, the service request will be made to the first eligible Service Provider. For example, if Company 1 has provided support in preparing a project document, the service request for the appraisal will be first sent to Company 2. The same principle applies if multiple Service Providers are using same consultant / expert. See further details Annex 3A Draft Framework Agreement CORRECTED. In case the Customer requires a service: -that has not been specified in relation to any of the sectors of the original competitive tendering procedure (Environmental, Infrastructure, Social Services), but is still inside the scope of Support, Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Sector Investment Facility; - estimated workload (taking into account the timetable) is too great for six people; or - none of the Service Providers can be accepted to fulfill the request for service, the Customer will send an invitation to tender to all selected Service Providers and will thus organize a “mini-competition” to which only the service providers selected to the Framework Agreement are able to submit tenders. The selection in mini-competition will be based on best price-quality tender. The tenders will be assessed on the basis of one or more of the following criteria: - Price (25-50 %) - Quality of offered personnel (25-50 %) - Quality of project plan (0-50 %) - Quality of working methods (0-50 %) See further details Annex 3A Framework Agreement.
Hankintanimikkeistö (CPV) pää
Hankintanimikkeistö (CPV) muutResearch and development services and related consultancy services (73000000)
AluekoodiFI
Pääasiallinen suorituspaikka

Sopimukset